Home   Info   DevZone   Wiki  
UsersWeb  |  MainWeb  |  InfoWeb  |  DevZoneWeb  |  SupportWeb
ToolBar ] [ not logged in ] [ Web: Imported ] goto:  options
[ get info on or edit ] login or new user ] [ list of topics, hubs & nodes, or recent changes ]

Proposed Upper Toolbars Please edit this as necessary...


[Projects]:
Would be a page with SignUpList, WorkingGroups, Resources ?
[Programming]:
Would be a page with SourceCode, NewSourceCode, InterfaceDefinitions, and Packages?
[Readings]:
Would have Conferences, Links, "Readings", Glossary, etc? (Re-name TheGlossary to Glossary?)
[Process]:
OurGoal , GoodStyle, NiftyPageStyles , Politics ? (Rename TheGoal to OurGoal?)
[FAQ], [MailingLists], [MemberList], and [Main] Leave 'em alone?


YOUR COMMENTS

I would like to see links to NiftyPageStyles and NewSourceCode at the top of every page. A link to WorkingGroups would fit in well, too. --StefanReich, 2/24/98

We already have too many links at the top, which one should be discarded? Does the new bullitin board system on the main page help? - ClarkEvans

Tough question, they're all very useful... Personally, I don't think there are too many links. --StefanReich, 2/27/98

Hmm. Well, I actually removed WorkingGroups ... since we wanted to add other ones... Anyway, having three rows of links gets to be pretty tedious. There is a point where there are "too many". I think that two rows (on a 640x480 screen) is that number. Suggestions? Perhaps TheGlossary and Readings could be collapsed into one. Or perhaps we can take one with 2-3 sub entries and make a top one... like "Programming" this page could have "Packages, Interfaces, etc." Help me out here.... -- ClarkEvans 2/27/98

How about putting Glossary, Resources, and Readings under "ReferenceDesk". "Resources" at the top of the page isn't very helpful to the uninitiated, since it isn't clear that it means "the person to contact about this or that issue". The newcomer is just as likely to think that "resources" are references and links about topics.

LestonBuell 2/27/98

How about breaking it into two or three groupings, with the big endians at the top, and the little endians at the bottom?

OmegaBaphomet 1998.02.27.23.16F




Content of these pages are owned and copyrighted by the poster.
Hosted by: